Where I think the Trump campaign needs to focus (16 Days out).

What is done is done and concentrating on the things that cannot be influenced or the battles that can’t be won is useless. I think it is all about the one and two percenters now that can tip the balance for every viable state to Trump (and yes to clear the extra hurdle of very obvious election fraud by the Democrats).

Catholicism – I cannot believe that Catholics are prepared to suck up Hillary’s campaign’s efforts and attitude towards them. Anyone who is Catholic ought to be a little outraged over the comments. The comments are not only derogatory and ill-thought out. Not only did they thumb their noses up at the religion but they also suggested changing Catholicism within and in their Culturally Marxist image of what it could be. I cannot tell you how much of an attack on religion and religious freedoms this is.

The tenets of Catholic faith are wrapped within within Ancient traditional views and these do not gel with the “Progressive Liberal” too well and so the “obvious” answer is to destroy the faith and make it something it is not and based not on the religious principles but on the secular “Progressive” Principles.

This is SUCH an opportunity. People DON’T know. Where are the largest Demographics of Catholics? In the tiny states of Rhode Island, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Connecticut and New York. These are ALL Deep Blue States. But even Vermont which may seem an unlikely connection give only 33% are religious and only 20% of the state are Catholic, there is a real possibility. A lot of people are “writing in” Bernie Sanders on the ballot. this is completely legal and does not delegitimise the vote. However essentially it means you effectively have Trump who would likely be out of contention in this state suddenly in contention as there are effectively a splitting of the Democratic base of Vermont between Bernie and Hillary. From there he just needs to push the Catholic contingent of both of these two bases and see what happens. It may be a lot closer than what may have ordinarily been assumed.

More than this states like Arizona and New Mexico have large Latino populations. Of these populations, what percentage are Democrats? Of these populations, what percentage are strong Catholics? I think given this and especially given the comments about “Needy Latinos”, a Pro-Trump Latino contingent would likely be able to push this message well in the minds of the Democrats supporters and give pause to who and what they are blindly supporting.

Uranium One – Hillary Clinton the one who spits poison at Vladimir Putin every chance she gets and blames Wikileaks on Russia and says Trump is close to Putin. Yet SHE signed off on a deal to sell contracts for 20% of all of USA’s rich Uranium deposits to Uranium One a Russia controlled company Uranium one. One that her right hand man John Podesta holds (or held – reports are that he has given them to his daughter). It was textbook pay to play. It is chronicled in Clinton Cash.

Go where there IS Russia connections and solid ones at that NOT allegations.

Child Care – These reforms are tangible and concrete and cannot help but appeal to ANY working parents. Ivanka lays it all out beautifully. This affects so many Americans and is such a change for what is currently available.

Project Veritas – The Democrats cannot divorce themselves from this. It not only nullifies the faux outrage on why Donald Trump would question the election results BUT also it shows in absolute terms that these people are colluding and paid for to disrupt and incite violence on behest of the Democrat Party. People were hurt and in my mind, each of these people now have a claim against the DNC if not Hillary. It also juxtapositions against Trump as the Law and Order candidate with Hillary as the Violence inciting candidate.

Taxes – People HAVE to be made aware that the talking point of Hillary’s that Trump will JUST reduce the taxes of the businesses CANNOT go unaddressed. Let people know that their own taxes are going down and that the regulations that inhibit companies being able to expand their businesses. The effect that will have on opportunity. Hillary is going to tax the rich more. So what?

Healthcare – Obamacare is practically a meme. Chelsea Clinton said on Obamacare (Affordable HealthCare “We know we do need to work on the affordable part of the Affordable Care Act.” Can’t write comedy like that. I think if he names states and increases and asks who did not expect this would happen.

Special Interests – Hillary is colluding with press, GOP, DNC, Agitators, Wall Street, Banks, Foreign Interests and they all expect their pound of flesh. Trump has virtual no big donors or special interest groups in comparison. No one owns him. He is able to be a lot less partisan when he tries to #Draintheswamp.

I think these stupid sexual assault “revelations”/”allegations” are complete bullshit and a distraction and smear. Its just too coincidental.

  • 3 weeks before a Presidential election
  • 1 week after he roasted Hillary Clinton’s husband for being an actual sexual predator
  • 2 weeks after the Trump Tapes came out
  • 5 months after The Clinton campaign had discussed making the “Donald the Groper narrative” that was exposed in the Wikileaks dump.

I man there are also inconsistencies, eye witnesses and even someone being found to do this just before releasing a porn movie.

Hillary does not take the High road with anything and she is not only setting the standard for future Male female candidate contender battles. The female candidate simply brings in these lying attention seeking women to accuse the male candidate of sexual abuse. There is the high road for you and the precedent she set and she set it 5 months ago in secret.

But Trump cannot focus on that or get drawn into making that a focus.

I think that the issues that sell are the ones above and they are the ones he should focus on. Any of the other issues are pretty much run out and I do not think we should try to change direction or re-clarify positions or introduce new issues.

I strongly believe he should mobilise his surrogates. The Military leaders and Mike Flynn ought to visit and do rallies for vets in Florida and Virginia for example. There is a lot of ground that can be made and efforts can be multiplied by getting everyone involved.

Anyhow that is my thoughts.

 

 

 

 

 

 

My two cents on the first Presidential debate

I hate Hillary BUT I love an underdog. That was Donald. Now I am not going to pretend and spin a narrative here. I will call it straight. Pieces fall where they may.

Hillary has been built up by the press and the Liberal surrogates to be this Uber-woman of politics. The pinnacle of Presidential candidacy. The best this to be injected into politics since whenever. In respect to Donald trump, he was unelectable, unpresidential, stupid, boorish, charmless, ineffectual, inarticulate, and a joke.

What they had failed, in their stupidity, to realise is where this sets the bar of expectation for each candidate. Hillary has to annihilate Trump and handle him with utmost ease and Trump has to fail utterly.

I admit I thought it would go precisely either of two ways. Either she was going to be the frail, sickly, unfocused and off form or she was going to be on her game and well-rehearsed, focused and in command of her faculties.

Trump in the last few months has consolidated and gone hard after Hillary’s lead. It has vanished and the battle ground states that were 6 or 7 points down, he is now leading in. The ones that were 13 points down are now in play and some are starting to shift into being in play, that were not considered anything but safe. (Who would have guessed Missouri, Illinois or Massachusetts would have been a consideration two months ago?) But now was the moment of reckoning.

He was taking on Hillary. A frail, unfocused Hillary not in command of her faculties would kill the remaining hope of winning. He was going to roll her if she was like that. I hoped this is what was going to happen. I hoped for a series of coughs,, maybe a seizure and topped off with her excusing herself and then fainting. That could have worked for me. The alternative was that an focused well-rehearsed Hillary would smash Trump and not only stop his meteoric rise in the polls but would start reversing all that work. Then I saw her.

It was healthy Hillary. My heart sank. Trump was screwed.

Then something rather unexpected happened (I should expect the unexpected with Trump), Trump rose to the occasion. He held his own. I still find it strange that I find this so surprising.

Now I promised you honesty and so honestly speaking, Hillary technically was much better. She was practiced. She was focused and by any metric she beat Trump. let’s keep it real. She was polished. She was Presidential and statesman-like. (Believe me I do not like saying this either). Trump? He was not polished. He was not as prepared. He went off topic a fair bit. He was given to a lot of vague meandering nonsense and he interrupted. BUT not a lot. He ALSO took it to her as much as she him and on bigger point. They both left their mark on each other. He was came up with some damn good points and more importantly enough of them.

YES Hillary out-performed Trump but not considerably. The truth is that he stayed with her right to the end. She was SUPPOSED to break past him and leave him in the dust instead of a winning photo finish. HER strength over Donald is an in-depth knowledge of policies and politics from 30 years involved intimately with it. It was her chance to prove how great she could show herself in this and how lacking Donald was in this area. THAT is ALL she has. (Well that, and a Moderator helping her). She could not do it.

Serious questions need to be asked in the Clinton camp. Trump brings hope, a new vision, a persuasive personality, energy, and an ability to talk off the cuff about what he feels with Americans. What else does Hillary have besides the weight of the Liberal press and establishment (that has not stopped the rise of Trump) AND the well rehearsed scripts on policies and political experience (that came to mean nothing in the debate)? She has nothing.

Its actually worse than that though. Hillary was on the top of her game. Trump exhausted her ammunition and kept himself in check. He got the feel of what she was like her measure. I know he will capitalise. Hillary is not an evolving creature. She is the final form. He adapts and evolve and we have seen this throughout the Presidential race. He is unpredictable and she will not be able to get a bead on her. He has her and he will got after her to counter her a little on next debate.

Moreso than this. He was more presidential and in control than he has been any time in the cycle and she was the polished robot. Therefore whilst she has scripted answers, he seemed to go off the cuff. Whilst the prattling was a bit much sometimes it sounded (true or not) honest. She did not sound honest (true or not), she sounded like she had practiced everything she said. With such little between them in the actual debate, this factor will possibly sway the undecided voters to Trump. It would have been absolutely different if she sounded like a robot AND buried Trump….but she didn’t.

I honestly cannot see Hillary capitalising on this debate for the next. The debate was a wash. But it gave the opponents at least a measure of each other. I think Hillary is not going to be able to prepare for the next debate’s Trump. She lost her opportunity to take control of the campaign and take Trump off the chess board and she failed.

The beauty of it is the Liberal press and Liberal establishment have helped pave the way for her lose in overrating Hillary and underrating Trump as badly as they have. Had they have been considered equals she would not appear to have done so badly below expectation and he would not have appeared to eclipse all expectation. They screwed themselves and I love the Schadenfreude.

Trump Train has no brakes, it would appear. He will be next President.

Damn Hillary – Found in the comment section

This is from Hunter Brooks a commenter in the comment section

Full credit to Hunter Brooks.

Spread this far and wide people.

The law says that no one has to use email, but it is a crime (18 U.S.C. section 1519) to destroy even one message to prevent it from being subpoenaed. Prosecutors charging someone with obstruction don’t even have to establish that any investigation was pending or under way when the deletion took place.

National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, the prosecutor “need only prove that the defendant shredded the documents, at least in part, to make life more difficult for future investigators, if and when they eventually appear.”

Legal commentators call this “anticipatory obstruction of justice,” and the law punishes it with up to 20 years imprisonment. The burden of proof is light. The Justice Department manual advises that section 1519 makes prosecution much easier because it covers “any matters” or “’in relation to or contemplation of’ any matters.” It adds, “No corrupt persuasion is required.”

Other problems for the scandal queen was to immediately turn over ALL the docs and emails when leaving office – she never did until the courts made her…3 years later

Unsecured Server – NEVER using a GOV secured device

Classified and Top Security Docs stored in unsecured server

The Federal Records Act requires agencies hold onto official communications, including all work-related emails, and government employees cannot destroy or remove relevant records.

FOIA is designed to “improve public access to agency records and information.”

The NARA regulations dictate how records should be created and maintained. They stress that materials must be maintained “by the agency,” that they should be “readily found” and that the records must “make possible a proper scrutiny by the Congress.”

Section 1924 of Title 18 has to do with deletion and retention of classified documents. “Knowingly” removing or housing classified information at an “unauthorized location” is subject to a fine or a year in prison.

The Federal Records Act
Clinton did not use an official government secure email account while serving as the country’s top diplomat. Instead, she used a private email account and kept all of her emails on a private server in her home to fly under the DC radar. SO noone would know whats shes doing as a head of state.

and MAYBE you should research The clintons taking in hundreds of millions with their pay for favors = Clinton TAX FREE Scam Foundation is all ok -Influence peddling to money laundering = Corrupt

There are many problems with the Clinton charity and ethics. In fact, the Clinton Foundation is so unlike a real charity that even charity watchdog group Charity Navigator refused to rate the Clinton Foundation because of its “atypical business model.”

One of those problems is the fact that the Clintons put big donors and close pals on the board for reasons that are hard to fathom. In fact, at least four of these “board members” have either been charged or convicted of serious financial irregularities, crimes including bribery and fraud and they help run the foundation?. Having a Code of Ethics is not in the Clinton’s scandal queens past which proves the Clintons dishonest character.

The Clinton Foundation has raised more than 2 Billion of TAX FREE Dollars and is a money machine “a cash cow” to hide the money the Clintons take in from wall street, special interest groups, lobbyist, oil, tech, pharm companies and even foreign Governments even while she was head of state.

Partial list

Overall foreign donations to the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton Health Access Initiative jumped 73% to just over $102 million from 2013 to 2014, the period when Hillary Clinton was prepping her run for the presidency.

Last February, the Wall Street Journal identified “at least 60 Companies that lobbied the State Department during (Hillary Clinton’s) tenure (which) donated a total of more than $26 million to the Clinton Foundation.”

Twenty-two of the 37 corporations nominated for a prestigious State Department award — and six of the eight ultimate winners — while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State were also donors to the Clinton family foundation.

Silicon Valley giant Cisco was the biggest foundation contributor nominated in 2009, giving the Clinton charity between $1 million and $5 million. The company then won the award in 2010 when eight of the 12 finalists and two of the three winners had donated to the foundation.

The other Clinton contributor to win that year, candy-maker Mars, Inc., had given between $25,000 and $50,000.

Coca-Cola was the most generous foundation donor to be honored as a finalist in 2010, giving a $5-10 million donation.

Tiger Machinery, a 2011 finalist, is the Russian dealer of Caterpillar, Inc. tractors and other heavy equipment. Caterpillar gave between $1,000 and $5,000 to the Clinton Foundation.

Intel, another Silicon Valley giant, was nominated for an award each year of Clinton’s time in office, winning the award in 2012. The technology company donated between $250,000 and $500,000.

Five of the eight finalists and one of the two winners were foundation donors in 2012. A finalist that year, Esso Angola, is an international subsidiary of Exxon-Mobil, a prolific contributor to the Clinton Foundation. Exxon-Mobil gave between $1 million and $5 million.

Twenty-two of the 37 corporations nominated for a prestigious State Department award — and six of the eight ultimate winners — while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State were also donors to the Clinton family foundation.

Each of the companies listed appear to have made at least a portion of their donations before 2013. However, the Clinton Foundation’s vague listings prevent a more thorough review.

Saudi Arabia has donated between $10 and $25 million, with the most recent contribution coming in 2014. Other unspecified donations have come from the state of Qatar, Kuwait, and the Sultanate of Oman, some of which, as reported by the Washington Post, were made while Clinton was Secretary of State.

Six banks under government investigation or in litigation were listed as public sponsors of the Clinton Global Initiative’s Annual Meeting, even after the investigations were widely publicized. The most notable of these was the Swiss banking giant HSBC, whose $81 million donation came at the same time that the bank was being investigated for money laundering. A former Goldman Sachs executive, Robert S. Harrison, is the CEO of the initiative

In 2014, the Goldman Sachs Group donated $1 million to $5 million to the Clinton foundation; Barclays, the Bank of America Foundation, and Citigroup each coughed up $500,000 to $1 million that year.

Four of Clinton’s top five donors since 1999 have been Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, and Morgan Stanley. Ending Wall Street greed is difficult when you’re funded by these interests.

Harry S Truman once said – “”You can’t get rich in politics unless you’re a crook.” Yet the Clintons have made hundreds of millions using their title and power = Influence peddling even money laundering = corrupt .